Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 92 results found
In “A (Very) Brief, Gospel-Centered Defense against the Problem of Evil,” Derek Rishmawy explains how we can know, through the Gospel, that God is indeed all-powerful, all-good, and all-knowing, despite the existence of evil: If God raised Jesus Christ from the dead, I have good reason to believe both that he exists, and that he is unfathomably powerful.
Continuing on the theme of yesterday’s post: Because our culture values equality, and because we (not believing in intrinsic human value anymore) think sameness is necessary for equality of value to exist, this also explains the anger many have towards the existence of gender roles in marriage. Why despise patriarchy? Because it entails one member of the marriage having a “higher” position than the other.
The denial of differences between male and female doesn’t reflect reality, and it leads to a loss of appreciation for the diverse male and female traits.
Michael Egnor has a fascinating post on neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield’s evidence-based conversion from materialism to dualism: Penfield began his career as a materialist, convinced that the mind was wholly a product of the brain. He finished his career as an emphatic dualist.
In Brett’s monthly letter, he points out the similarity between our ability to perceive (and have knowledge of) moral reality and our ability to perceive physical reality:
In the PragerU video “Where Do Good and Evil Come From?” philosopher Peter Kreeft explains why objective morality can only come from a source higher than anything in the natural world. Enjoy! (HT: Joe Carter)
Reasonable Faith has a new apologetics video on Leibniz’s contingency argument for the existence of God. Enjoy!
Kenneth Keathley says of the following video:
If we can convince people our value comes not from the abilities we’re expressing at a particular moment in time but from the kind of being we are...then a case for universal intrinsic human value can be made.
More disturbing than the fact that a new definition of marriage is now the law of the land is the way in which this transformation was accomplished. The actions of the Court do not respect the Constitution as a document containing principles the justices are obliged to recognize and conform their decisions to.