Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 128 results found
Scientists can’t figure out why the asymmetry between matter and antimatter that’s necessary for life exists in this universe. Is this another case of fine-tuning?
Sometimes, when answering an apologetics question about science, you just need to appeal to the facts. But do you know the facts?
Many scientists claim the original human population size was far greater than just an Adam and Eve, but the work of conservation biologists indicates the methods used to determine this aren't valid.
Slate posted an article the other week about bills that ban abortions after an embryo’s heartbeat is detected. It was a dishonest article that distorted the science and placed too great an emphasis on fringe religious belief.
Some contemporary scientists have argued that something can come from nothing, but it turns out they’re equivocating on the word “nothing.”
Tim responds to the idea that time came into existence with the Big Bang and whether or not it will continue forever.
Tim continues to respond to objections to the argument that the universe is fine-tuned to permit the existence of life.
Alan expresses a concern about the new movie “Is Genesis History?”
Yes, the fine-tuning of the universe for life is highly unlikely, but unlikely things happen all the time, right? Here's why this objection to the fine-tuning argument doesn't work.
Read some thoughts from our speakers: What can you do when someone challenges your faith? Do atheists have a burden of proof? What finely-tuned conditions were necessary for life?