Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 29 results found
Tim explains how many scientists exclude possible conclusions based on philosophical ideas before looking at the evidence.
Tim gives a helpful analogy for biblical faith.
Can a person who believes in a God that does not exist still have a good grounding for objective morality? The distinction between “in principle” and “in reality” is crucial to answering this question.
What is faith according to the Bible? Are science and faith at odds?
It’s tempting to think belief in God comes down to the evidence and nothing else. But is it really that simple? Does belief in God merely depend on evidence?
As Christians, how should we respond when someone rejects the idea that whatever begins to exist has a cause?
Scientism claims we can’t have knowledge about religion or ethics because the only way to know reality is through the five senses. Here are three reasons why this view is problematic.
If a pro-life atheist doesn’t believe in a Moral Law Giver, can their view be consistent?
Alan discusses the implications of not subscribing to a particular religion and the most probable beliefs that follow.
Alan responds to an argument against God’s existence.