How to Let Your Opponent Make Your Case—Mentoring Letter February 2015

Author Greg Koukl Published on 02/01/2015

Pay attention. Listen carefully. Think about the ramifications of statements others make in unguarded moments when they’re not defending turf.

Sometimes when a person disagrees with you on a critical concern—abortion, for instance—he will give your view a leg up without realizing it when talking about something else. If you stay alert, you might be able to leverage his point in support of our own.

A perfect example came from a pro-choice radio talk-show host when he took a call from a blind man who felt that people had sometimes treated him as less of a person because of his disability. The host was appalled.

“Just because you’ve lost your sight, are you any less who you are?” he asked.

“No,” the caller answered.

“If I lost my sight or my ability to speak or do a radio show,” the host continued, “wouldn’t I still be who I am? Wouldn’t I still be me?”

“It’s ridiculous for anyone to think,” he concluded, “that a blind person is any less of a person just because he can’t see.”

It was a great, common-sense observation: Losing any physical ability can’t make any human being substandard since he still remains himself. Yet isn’t this very point implicitly denied in pro-abortion circles by the claim that the unborn is not a real person because he lacks certain abilities?

As I drove along, I bantered with the host in a one-way conversation in my car. “Listen to yourself: ‘Wouldn’t I still be me?’ Keep whittling away body parts and abilities and keep asking the same question,” I pleaded.

What if the caller were smaller in stature, or weighed only a pound, like many preemies, or even less than an ounce, like a zygote? Would that make a difference in who he was? What if he had no legs, or his body was terribly misshapen by some horrible defect? Would he be any less himself? Would he be any less a valuable human being?

How many body parts or capabilities can I lose or alter and still be myself? The answer: No matter how many pieces I’m missing, no matter how many capabilities I lose, as long as I’m still alive, I’m still me.

Human value transcends abilities—or lack of abilities—because human beings are valuable based on what they are, not on what they do. Therefore, missing abilities can’t disqualify human value. Indeed, if it did—if someone’s worth were based on physical performance—then only the physically perfect would be safe.

It’s a powerful point—a line of thinking completely contained implicitly in the talk show host’s simple observation: “Wouldn’t I still be me?”

Precisely the same point came from another unlikely source: Superman.

In 1995, actor Christopher Reeve suffered a terrible riding accident that shattered his first and second vertebrae. Immobilized from the neck down, unable to breathe without a machine, Reeve whispered to his wife, Dana, “Maybe we should let me go.”

“You’re still you,” she said, tearfully, “and I love you.”

Reeve lived another decade, acting, directing, and ultimately lobbying Congress in favor of human embryonic stem cell research—all from his wheelchair. He also wrote his autobiography. It was titled, Still Me.

Do you see the irony? Reeve was still his valuable self despite his lack of physical ability. Unfortunately, he didn’t apply his own reasoning to other human beings in the embryonic stage.

Here’s the takeaway: Pay attention. Listen carefully. Think about the ramifications of statements others make in unguarded moments when they’re not defending turf. They may just make a common-sense admission that will end up supporting your point, not theirs.

Equipping you to make gracious and incisive arguments for classical Christianity and Christian values is at the core of who we are. That’s why we have produced a powerful print resource for you. Precious Unborn Human Persons poses the one question that ends the abortion debate but which is almost never addressed. And it’s our gift to you for your kind support this month.

Will you give a generous gift today to equip thousands of Christian Ambassadors—and ensure that the Christian worldview has a place in the cultural debate?

When you respond with your donation, be sure to ask for Precious Unborn Human Persons. It’s a key tool that brings clear thought and careful logic to abortion dialogues—and it’s our way of saying thanks for your gracious friendship and support.

Always ready,

Gregory Koukl