Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 101 results found
It seems like every time I turn around I hear of another prominent Christian thinker or theologian who has embraced Darwinism. It’s deeply disconcerting. In light of the stature of these Evangelical leaders, some people are going to ask, “What do they know that I don’t know? I thought this was a done deal. It’s either Darwin or God.”
This week's challenge is a graphic (click on it to get a closer view). Your friend posts this on your Facebook page...what do you say? How can you turn this into a good conversation? What points is this graphic intended to make? How would you counter those points? Leave your ideas in the comments below, and then check back on Thursday to see Alan's response. [View Alan's video response.]
The New Republic has published an excellent review of atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel’s book, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False, by Alvin Plantinga. Here are excerpts from the review listing the four areas where Nagel objects to materialist naturalism as being reasonable:
R.C. Sproul of Ligonier Ministries explains how he approaches this question:
A University of British Columbia study just rel
Jay Wesley Richards explains why theistic evolution is an attempt to join incompatible ideas. The view requires redefining one of the terms, which fundamentally changes the terms.
Evolution is dancing on the Titanic.
Nancy Pearcey gives yet another example in Saving Leonardo of how the Christian worldview led to the rise of science:
Continuing from Wednesday's post, here's what Nancy Pearcey had to say in Saving Leonardo about the effect the Christian worldview had on Galileo's scientific advances:
In Nancy Pearcey’s excellent book, Saving Leonardo, she explains why Greek thought didn't create modern science: