the BLOG

Explore by Topic

Explore by Format

Search Results | 44 results found

Are Our Lives Our Own?

Is life a gift with a transcendent purpose to be fulfilled, or do we own ourselves and have the right to do with our bodies whatever we please? This question can be answered in part with a little reflection. Why do we feel compelled to talk someone out of suicide? Why try to dissuade them? The reason is that we have an intuitive sense that life has transcendent purpose. We're so sure of this that we try to stop people from killing themselves and "wasting" their lives.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | April 3, 2013

Life Chains

Two thoughts here: Why it's not necessary to have a "passion for the unborn" in order to do something meaningful to save them, and why "life chains" may do more harm than good. Our last caller raised an issue I actually intended on talking about today. His question was about pro-life "life chains."The last two nights I was at different crisis pregnancy events-- a maternity home on Friday night and a crisis pregnancy center on Saturday night-- working really hard to raise funds for them. I'll be speaking at another fund-raising banquet later this week.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | April 3, 2013

"Life a Beautiful Choice? It's Not So Beautiful for an Unwanted Child."

“Life a ‘beautiful choice?’ It’s not so beautiful for an unwanted child.” Believe it or not, a pastor made this comment. I had to ask myself, “Why isn’t an unwanted child’s life beautiful?” The answer is, because he’s unwanted. But this alone doesn’t make anyone’s life miserable. There’s more to it than this. What makes an unwanted child’s life miserable? Other people do. Unwanted children are unhappy because of the way they’re treated.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | April 3, 2013

Kids: Have an Abortion, Not a Smoke

If a woman even a teenager, even a minor, even without her parents' consent has an inalienable right to have an abortion, then how does one argue she can't do something less violent to her body than such a medical procedure, and less violent to the body of another human being--the unborn child--than smoking? How does one argue this is no longer an acceptable choice?

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | April 3, 2013

Ethnic Cleansing in the Womb

Disqualifying the unborn’s claim to life because of some physical characteristic—such as the fetus’s primitive level of development or a congenital defect—is precisely what ethnic cleansing is about. Ethnic cleansing is appalling for one simple reason: Valuable human beings are eradicated merely because of some physical difference or “inadequacy.” The person is condemned for his ethnicity. His features--skin, hair or eye color, shape of face, blood ancestry--are different from the accepted norm.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | April 3, 2013

Is Abortion a Holocaust?

Many Jews recoil at the use of the word “holocaust” to describe legalized abortion. To them it’s an offense to the memory of six million Jews who perished under the Third Reich. The Jewish Holocaust was obviously more heinous than the same amount of abortions would be. Let’s think about that for a minute.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | March 30, 2013

Abortions and Holocaust

Some say that calling abortion a holocaust is an offense to the memory of six million Jews that perished at the hands of the Third Reich. It's simply not the same. That depends. There does seem to be a sense in which one could decry the tragedy of the abortion holocaust, yet say that the Nazi Holocaust was a greater evil. Both are unspeakably evil, purely on the merit of the number of human lives sacrificed. However, in the case of the Jewish Holocaust, the evil is compounded by the circumstances under which it was done.

Quick Thought | Bio-Ethics | Greg Koukl | March 30, 2013

Would Hitler and Mother Teresa Suffer the Same Fate if They Weren't Christians?

Yes and no. No, because they'd answer for different crimes and, as such, their judgment would be different. Just as there are degrees of sin (see John 19:11), there are degrees of punishment. Jesus said Sodom would fare better than Capernaum in the day of judgment (Matthew 11:24), though each would be condemned. Yes, because each person must ultimately answer for his own sins--Hitler for his, Mother Teresa for hers, you and I for ours. Unless, of course, Jesus is allowed to answer for them.

Quick Thought | Apologetics | Greg Koukl | March 22, 2013

Good and Bad Deeds in the Balance

God demands we live ethically.  But what about those times when we don't?  The most vital issue Christianity answers is "How can we be right with God when we are not thoroughly good?"  There is profound misunderstanding on this point.  Part of the confusion is because many err in defining goodness according to human standards.  God, on this view, is concerned with what kind of individual one is "on average." If the good outweighs the bad—if good is predominant—then God winks at the occasional moral lapse.

Quick Thought | Ethics | Greg Koukl | March 22, 2013

No Hint of Politics

It’s not only the left that expresses alarm when Christians jeopardize the “separation” between church and state when they stir from their slumber and begin to make a difference in the public square.  Some Believers object, too.  One Evangelical leader offered this stern warning:  “There should not be even a hint of anything political in our public discourse.” 

Quick Thought | Christianity & Culture | Greg Koukl | March 13, 2013