Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 371 results found
Someone might conclude on the basis of the observed regularity of nature that miracles are impossible and therefore illogical, but are they really contrary to the laws of logic?
Tim explains how many scientists exclude possible conclusions based on philosophical ideas before looking at the evidence.
Since God is an individual subject, wouldn’t any morality grounded in Him be subjective rather than objective?
We can be good without God, but would goodness even exist without God? Greg explains the argument for God from morality.
In this intense short film, a professor finds himself facing someone who embodies the naturalistic ideas about morality he’s been promoting, and it doesn’t turn out well for him.
Tim gives a helpful analogy for biblical faith.
In Peter Boghossian’s tactical approach in A Manual for Creating Atheists, anything that moves believers towards doubt is considered a success. Even invalid arguments with false premises.
Can a person who believes in a God that does not exist still have a good grounding for objective morality? The distinction between “in principle” and “in reality” is crucial to answering this question.
What is faith according to the Bible? Are science and faith at odds?
It’s tempting to think belief in God comes down to the evidence and nothing else. But is it really that simple? Does belief in God merely depend on evidence?