Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 114 results found
Are naturalistic assumptions necessary for doing science? Stephen Meyer argues that, no, it was a Christian worldview that gave rise to modern science.
From our biological blueprint, to the fine-tuning of the universe, to the human experience of beauty, morality, and guilt, God is the best explanation for the way things are.
Some contemporary scientists have argued that something can come from nothing, but it turns out they’re equivocating on the word “nothing.”
Yes, the fine-tuning of the universe for life is highly unlikely, but unlikely things happen all the time, right? Here's why this objection to the fine-tuning argument doesn't work.
William Lane Craig describes five rational beliefs that can’t be scientifically proven.
Guest Host: J. Warner Wallace Science has shown us that God does not exist, how can you still believe in God? There are many ways to God. I think Christianity is just one out of the many ways. What would be your response? Why did Jesus have to die? Download the mp3...
Michael Egnor has a fascinating post on neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield’s evidence-based conversion from materialism to dualism: Penfield began his career as a materialist, convinced that the mind was wholly a product of the brain. He finished his career as an emphatic dualist.
There are a host of reasons why I believe Christians should not embrace macroevolution. Among the most serious is the theistic evolutionist’s rejection of a historical Adam. In this podcast, Tim walks through three biblical reasons why denying a real Adam creates many more problems than it solves. Download the mp3...
Host: Greg Koukl Guest: Dr. Hugh Ross – Living on the Autism Spectrum and Navigating Genesis: A Scientist’s Journey through Genesis 1-11 Download the mp3...
Greg Koukl answers questions in 4 minutes or less Adam and Eve, apologetics, sin, conspiracy theories, decision making. Download the mp3...