Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 43 results found
For those who ask, "How will same-sex marriage hurt me?," for starters note New Mexico Supreme Court Justice Bossin's sobering admission of the sacrifice of religious freedom and personal liberties, two of the three casualties of this experiment of social engineering by the Left (the other being parental rights). Religious liberty:
Atheists claim that no eternal life and forgiveness actually leads to more accountability here on earth. How do you respond? COMMENTS
A common defense for homosexuality is that same-sex attraction is natural for homosexuals.  There’s nothing wrong with homosexuality - the animal kingdom is filled with examples of same-sex erotic behavior.  It's natural.  Now on the surface, there seems to be some truth to the claim that homosexuality is natural.  It’s not unusual, for example, to see male dogs mount each other in an erotic way.  There are two problems with this view, however.
Jay Wesley Richards explains why theistic evolution is an attempt to join incompatible ideas. The view requires redefining one of the terms, which fundamentally changes the terms.
Evolution is dancing on the Titanic.
Is theistic evolution compatible with a historical Adam and Eve?
Is evolution compatible with Christianity? If Christians believe in evolution, what do we do with imago dei?
Should Christian couples consider becoming foster parents when there is a risk that the child may be adopted by a “gay-couple” and then be subjected to their lifestyle which is contrary to Christian belief?
Can we discover morality through science?
There's a fundamental, self-refuting flaw in Stephen Hawking's argument in his new book.  He begins with the idea that the world is determined.  Everything, including human beings, operate according to mechanistic laws of nature.  Free will and agency is an illusion, he claims. But then there's a problem with the apparently rationally-based effort to persuade us of his view, which is the apparent purpose of the book book. The goal of his book is at odds with the determinism he is committed to.