Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 23 results found
A popular pro-choice meme says the Bible teaches that life begins at first breath, but not only does the Bible not teach this, but there are also four other reasons why this meme fails.
To clear up some confusion about biology: A sperm can potentially create a human being, but an embryo already is one. Here’s why the two are not analogous.
Here’s why it doesn't make sense to say you’re “personally pro-life” but support a woman’s right to an abortion.
In a recent CNN interview, a politician said, “When a woman is pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her," but embryology textbooks tell us something different. Here’s what they have to say.
Tim explains how many scientists exclude possible conclusions based on philosophical ideas before looking at the evidence.
Tim gives a helpful analogy for biblical faith.
Can a person who believes in a God that does not exist still have a good grounding for objective morality? The distinction between “in principle” and “in reality” is crucial to answering this question.
What is faith according to the Bible? Are science and faith at odds?
It’s tempting to think belief in God comes down to the evidence and nothing else. But is it really that simple? Does belief in God merely depend on evidence?
As Christians, how should we respond when someone rejects the idea that whatever begins to exist has a cause?