Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 29 results found
Tim explains how many scientists exclude possible conclusions based on philosophical ideas before looking at the evidence.
Tim gives a helpful analogy for biblical faith.
Can a person who believes in a God that does not exist still have a good grounding for objective morality? The distinction between “in principle” and “in reality” is crucial to answering this question.
What is faith according to the Bible? Are science and faith at odds?
It’s tempting to think belief in God comes down to the evidence and nothing else. But is it really that simple? Does belief in God merely depend on evidence?
As Christians, how should we respond when someone rejects the idea that whatever begins to exist has a cause?
Everyone has a worldview, but a worldview is only a good one if it describes reality accurately. You can start helping your young children develop an accurate worldview.
Tim Barnett is on a timer, and answers questions about Hell, the Kingdom of God, and if Christianity were false.
Many evolutionary naturalists attempt to ground morality in naturalistic evolution. This is fraught with serious difficulties that form an insurmountable case against evolution as the foundation of morality.
Some contemporary scientists have argued that something can come from nothing, but it turns out they’re equivocating on the word “nothing.”