Explore by Topic
Explore by Format
Search Results | 82 results found
Here's my response to this week's challenge: COMMENTS Read more posts
Alan explains that even though science is a tool for explaining the world, it is neither the only nor the best tool. COMMENT Read more posts
Alan addresses the following claim: Morality is doing what is right regardless of what you are told. Religion is doing what you are told regardless of what is right. Download the mp3...
Alan answers the question of whether killing an abortionist to protect the unborn is parallel to killing a person who attempts to murder a toddler. Download the mp3...
Alan answers the question, "What are some ways Christians can show love to homosexuals, both inside and outside the church?"
Alan responds to the question, "Is Leviticus' prohibition of homosexuality outdated and irrelevant?"
Alan discusses the morality of cloning.
Alan explains how the important principle of truth and compassion plays out in the discussion on homosexuality. Download the mp3 version...
Alan responds to the claim that pro-lifers are inconsistent if they support the death penalty. I am back from vacation. I was out of town, so that’s probably why you haven’t seen me doing challenges in several weeks. Instead, you’ve had to tolerate Brett. It’s funny because he’s 10 or 12 years older than me, so he has to do all those cool things with his family, music, and cool graphics to look young and edgy. I hope he’s been doing a good job with that.
Alan responds to a challenge: If a lab was burning and you could only save a toddler or 10 embryos, which would you save? Since most pro-lifers usually say they would save the toddler, this proves that they don't really believe that human embryos are valuable human beings like the toddler. If you were in a burning lab and you had to choose between saving ten embryos or one toddler, which would you choose? You’d choose the toddler, wouldn't you? That just proves that you don't really think the embryos are valuable human beings like the toddler.