Materialists
- people who don’t believe in God and souls and demons and angels
and heaven and hell and the afterlife and all of that - believe in what
you can experience with the five senses, and that is the physical realm.
That’s their metaphysical view. Metaphysical views are views about
what you believe is real, and a materialist believes that the only thing
that is real is matter in motion. Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens,
for example, hold to this view. “Materialism” is the view that,
at least methodologically, drives modern science. It’s the worldview
of the “new atheists” who are very aggressive arguing that religion
is irrational and dangerous.
They
say you can believe in God if you want, but when it comes to doing science,
you cannot make reference to agency outside of the natural realm. Materialists
have a tremendous amount of confidence that science will answer all
of the relevant questions, because all of the relevant questions only
entail things that are physical, since only physical things exist. There’s
no need, in other words, for sticking God in the so-called gap.
I
think that Christians are in part responsible for the confidence that
materialists have that science will fill the gap because many Christians
make a consistent mistake regarding the relationship of faith and reason.
The error itself is evidenced in this question that I hear variations
of this all the time: “If there is so much evidence for God, then
what’s the point of faith?” If our evidence for Christianity is
so great that it amounts to giving us knowledge of facts that we can
know for sure, then it squeezes faith right out of the equation.
Notice
something very important about this perspective that many Christians
hold. It puts faith in opposition to knowledge. There’s
an inverse relationship between the two, such that when you increase
one, you decrease the other. You increase knowledge, faith decreases
because you can’t have faith in what you know. Faith is what you exercise
when you don’t know. This casts faith as a kind of religious wishful
thinking because wishful thinking is all that’s available to you when
you don’t know something.
Knowledge
is what you know so faith is reserved for ignorance. This is what some
people think Paul meant when he said, “We walk by faith and not by
sight.” We walk by believing—faith—not by knowing—sight. And
if we know, it’s no longer faith. Knowledge, in this equation, is
the enemy of faith, and Christians are told to have faith.
This
view is clearly false in a moment’s reflection and examination of
Scripture. The opposite of knowledge is not faith, it’s ignorance.
And the opposite of faith is not knowledge, it’s unbelief.
It’s
also not what the Bible teaches about faith, and this is the salient
point. There are many Christians who have a view of faith that is not
Biblical. In fact, it is contrary to the Bible. And this view of faith
that’s contrary to the Bible ends up giving aid and comfort to materialism,
theism’s primary worldview rival in our time.
The
Bible teaches that faith is trusting in what you know to be true because
you have reason to believe it’s true. I develop this point at length
in an article entitled “Faith Is Not Wishing,” so I’m not going
to pursue the details here, except to give you a couple of examples.
Jesus
said in Mark 2, “In order that you may know that the Son of Man has
the power to forgive sins,” because He had just said to the paralytic,
“Your sins are forgiven.” This annoyed people. Of course, nobody
could see whether the sins were actually forgiven, so He said, “In
order that you may know that I have the power to forgive sins,
I say to you, take up your pallet and go home.” The act of healing
was something they could see to secure the reality, the knowledge,
the certainty, the fact of something they couldn’t see—forgiveness
of sin. And it was this that inspired their acts of trust. They had
knowledge that sin could be forgiven, and this is precisely why
they were able to exercise trust.
Acts
2, Pentecost Sunday. Peter gave his message about the resurrection of
Christ and the visible effects of the Spirit on their lives—the manifestations
of speaking in many languages and tongues of fire that the people heard
and saw. Peter said, “We’re not drunk. This is the Holy Spirit.”
This is a fulfillment of prophecy, another evidence. He explains the
evidence of the manifestations they could see and hear, evidence of
fulfilled prophecy, and Jesus risen from the dead. “This man you crucified,
God raised from the dead.” That’s another proclamation of an evidence—the
empty tomb, the resurrection of Christ—and this was also prophesied.
David the Psalmist spoke of it—another evidence. He gives evidence,
after evidence, after evidence, and then concludes, Let all the House
of Israel take a big leap of faith, because you can’t know any of
this. No, of course not. He says, “Let all the House of Israel know
for certain that God has caused Him to be Lord and Messiah, this
Jesus whom you’ve crucified.” There is no leap of faith. There isn’t
faith based on ignorance, but rather an act of trust that is based on
knowledge, and the knowledge is based on the evidence.
The
atheist looks at the misconstrued equation about faith and knowledge
in exactly the same way as many mistaken Christians do. There are things
you can know, and therefore there’s no need for faith. Faith is what
you use when you’re ignorant.
As
science and other fields of knowledge have advanced, we are ignorant
about fewer things. Therefore, on this errant definition of faith, the
things that we can actually exercise faith in has decreased because
science has explained it. So those things that we might have, in ignorance,
posited God for, have now been explained by science or will soon be
explained. Science has explained so many things that seemed to
need God to account for them, that there is now less need for God, on
this view of faith. As a result, the God hypothesis, then, has less
and less explanatory power, because the mysteries are giving way to
knowledge and science.
Materialists,
atheists, are buoyant. They’re exuberant. And I am completely sympathetic,
at least in principle, to the atheists’ point if this is the way it
is with faith and knowledge. The gaps, at least in principle, will all
be filled by scientific knowledge and religion will be finally seen
to be wishful thinking and superstition. That’s what we’re facing
on this view of knowledge and faith as polar opposites.
On
the contrary, faith is not opposite or contrary to knowledge.
The expansion of knowledge by science, or by any other means, is no
threat to faith and Christianity. If faith involves trusting in what
we know, then the more we know, the more opportunity we have to trust.
Faith and knowledge are companions that help us place our trust in God.
On
the Biblical understanding of knowledge and faith, as knowledge increases,
the ability to trust increases—the ability to exercise Biblical faith,
which is an act of trust. The more we know about the intricate design
in the universe, the reality of Jesus the Nazarene, the historical fact
of the resurrection, all as well-justified true beliefs, the more we
can put our trust in the God who became a man in Jesus, rose from the
dead to rescue us from the debilitating and ultimately deadly disease
of sin.
There’s
no wishful thinking here. No leap of faith. No blind faith. Just
a reasonable step of trust—trusting something we have good reason
to believe is true. That’s the Biblical view. And it does not aid
and abet the atheist.
|