<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Stand to Reason Video Podcast</title>
        <description>This video podcast contains Greg Koukl's video blogs which can be found at www.str.org. Our purpose is to help Christians think more clearly about their faith and to help them make an even-handed, incisive, yet gracious defense for classical Christianity.</description>
        <link>http://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=podcast</link>
        <category>Religion &amp; Spirituality/Christianity</category>
        <copyright>©2006 Stand to Reason; All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:20:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <managingEditor>info@str.org</managingEditor>
        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
        <webMaster>webmaster@str.org</webMaster>
        <generator>FeedForAll Mac v2.1 (2.1.0.1); http://www.FeedForAll.com/</generator>
        <itunes:subtitle>Helping Christians to think more clearly about their faith</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>This video podcast rebroadcasts Greg Koukl's video blogs which can be found at www.str.org. Our purpose is to help Christians think more clearly about their faith and to help them make an even-handed, incisive, yet gracious defense for classical Christianity.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality">
            <itunes:category text="Christianity"/>
        </itunes:category>
        <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
            <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
        </itunes:category>
        <itunes:keywords>Stand to Reason, Christian, Greg Koukl, Christianity, Bible, Religion, God, apologetics, philosophy</itunes:keywords>
        <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:email>info@str.org</itunes:email>
            <itunes:name>Stand to Reason</itunes:name>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:image href="http://str.org/podcast/podcast_video.jpg" />
        <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        
        <item>
            <title>Atheists' Non-belief</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>I've grown frustrated with atheists saying to me that they don't have to give any arguments or evidence to support their view, because they are not making any claims. They have a "non-belief". One atheist told me he is not required to provide evidence that there are no fairies living under his house either. This seems so cheap, so lame, yet I'm not sure how to make that obvious to them. What do you suggest?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/atheist-non-belief-iphone.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/atheist-non-belief-iphone.m4v" length="65820521" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">atheist-non-belief-phone.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Atheists' Non-belief</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: I've grown frustrated with atheists saying to me that they don't have to give any arguments or evidence to support their view, because they are not making any claims. They have a &quot;non-belief&quot;. One atheist told me he is not required to provide evidence that there are no fairies living under his house either. This seems so cheap, so lame, yet I'm not sure how to make that obvious to them. What do you suggest?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>5:26</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>2 Timothy 3:16</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>Does 2 Timothy 3:16 refer to itself and the New Testament or is it referring to the Old Testament only?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/2_tim_3_16_iphone.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/2_tim_3_16_iphone.m4v" length="55808734" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2_tim_3_16_iphone.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - 2 Timothy 3:16</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Does 2 Timothy 3:16 refer to itself and the New Testament or is it referring to the Old Testament only?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>4:34</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Christians and Facebook</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>How should we as Christians respond when we have non-Christian friends using Facebook to challenge Christian views or make comments?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/facebook.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/facebook.m4v" length="30056914" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">facebook.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:35:35 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Christians and Facebook</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: How should we as Christians respond when we have non-Christian friends using Facebook to challenge Christian views or make comments?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>2:27</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Was Jesus Really Tempted?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>Was Jesus really tempted if He could not sin? Does the temptation imply that He could sin?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/jesus_really_tempted.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/jesus_really_tempted.m4v" length="77466087" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">jesus_really_tempted.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Was Jesus Really Tempted</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Was Jesus really tempted if He could not sin? Does the temptation imply that He could sin?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>6:23</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Sinner's Prayer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>Is someone saved if they say the sinner's prayer?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/sinners_prayer.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/sinners_prayer.m4v" length="38550737" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">sinners_prayer.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:28:37 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Sinner's Prayer</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Is someone saved if they say the sinner's prayer?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>3:09</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Pray for Groups</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>Is it appropriate to pray for the salvation of whole groups of people (atheists and others) when you know God is not going to save everyone?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/pray_for_groups.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/pray_for_groups.m4v" length="42799864" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">B479F0B3-8A61-4772-8A64-B4627C9A5CE8-1333-00000B3712209E67-FFA</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Pray for Groups</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Is it appropriate to pray for the salvation of whole groups of people (atheists and others) when you know God is not going to save everyone?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>3:29</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>God, Time and Prayer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>Since God exists outside of time, is it appropriate to pray for events that you know have already occurred, assuming God could apply your answer to a present prayer, to an event in the past?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/god_time_prayer.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/god_time_prayer.m4v" length="39818546" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">god_time_prayer-m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:03:40 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - God, Time and Prayer</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Since God exists outside of time, is it appropriate to pray for events that you know have already occurred, assuming God could apply your answer to a present prayer, to an event in the past?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>3:15</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Tactics and Calvinism</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>How do you reconcile Calvinism and employing tactics to defend Christianity?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/justin_calvinism.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/justin_calvinism.m4v" length="26846257" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">justin_calvinism.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Tactics and Calvinism</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: How do you reconcile Calvinism and employing tactics to defend Christianity?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>3:52</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Design Inference</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host: </b>Greg Koukl<div><b><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></b></div><div><b>Question: </b>How do you repond to the claim that the universe only has the appearance of design and we can't draw any inferences about a Creator from that?</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/design_inference.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/design_inference.m4v" length="48244891" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">design_inference.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Design Inference</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: How do you repond to the claim that the universe only has the appearance of design and we can't draw any inferences about a Creator from that?
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>3:58</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title>Diplomacy</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><b>Host:</b> Greg Koukl<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div><b>Question:&nbsp;</b>Is it always right to be diplomatic? Do you only apply diplomacy in matters of philosophical debate or do you apply it to debate over morals and sin? I'm thinking of John the Baptist's rebuke of Herod (for marrying his brother's wife), Paul's public rebuke of Peter (for being a hypocrite), and Jesus talking to the Pharisees, calling them "white-washed tombs full of dead men's bones".</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/jane_diplomacy.m4v</link>
            <author>Greg Koukl (info@str.org)</author>
            <category>Christianity</category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.m4v?http://www.strcast2.org/videos/blog/jane_diplomacy.m4v" length="18907385" type="video/x-m4v"  ></enclosure>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">jane_diplomacy.m4v</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:00:44 -0800</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Blog - Diplomacy</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Host: Greg Koukl

Question: Is it always right to be diplomatic? Do you only apply diplomacy in matters of philosophical debate or do you apply it to debate over morals and sin? I'm thinking of John the Baptist's rebuke of Herod (for marrying his brother's wife), Paul's public rebuke of Peter (for being a hypocrite), and Jesus talking to the Pharisees, calling them &quot;white-washed tombs full of dead men's bones&quot;.
</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>1:33</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:keywords>Greg Koukl culture captive Buddhism Richard Foster politics seeker centered</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:author>Greg Koukl</itunes:author>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        </item>

    </channel>
</rss>
